On FrameMaker there are some workarounds, but I doubt that they'd work in Word.So, my advice to you: learn LaTeX and use BibTex, I've heard nothing but excellent things about it.HTHdeppix However, if you plan to have multiple bibliography (primary and secondary references, bibliography etc.) EndNote is severely limited. If you decide to stay with Word, EndNote 7 is probably your best bet as it integrates very well. Anyway, none of them offered anything I needed, that wasn't already implemented in v4. ![]() No, FrameMaker is not just for technical writing it's for any kind of structured writing (which a thesis certainly qualifies for).Now, to the main question regarding bibliographic software: I have used EndNote for my thesis and was kind of happy with it, because I kept using version 4 - View image here: - Version 5 wouldn't run under Classic (no idea why, it was specific to my setup and I never figured out the reason), v6 was a disaster (slow, unstable) and v7 was too late. The handling of foot/endnotes will definitively pose a huge problem if you don't use anything more robust (and usually, it does so towards the end of the writing - View image here: -) I have a friend who swears by LaTeX (yes, for humanities) and others who use FrameMaker (as have I last reason to keep Classic around). I'm not a humanities-guy, but even so I would STRONGLY advise you not to use Word for anything longer than a few pages. Anyway, I'll shut up now - View image here:. I'm using it for a Criminology PhD, and after the somewhat steep learning curve, I couldn't be happier (and my thesis looks much nicer than most people's because of it). It's worth learning LaTeX, even if you aren't doing something that requires its equation capabilities. It's way too important to risk getting a corrupted document. However, I doubt that will be of much interest to you if you are using Word v.X.Unsolicited advice: A lot of people have done a lot of stuff with all sorts of versions of Word, but personally, I am not trusting my PhD thesis to it. I haven't tried the latest one yet (7?), but I haven't heard good things about it either.Personally, I use BibDesk, which is a Cocoa interface to BibTeX. ![]() I haven't heard of those same sorts of problems under the Windows version. I have tried Endnote (my university has a site license, so I can use it for free), and I've found it to be very unstable under OS X. You can't laugh at that.I don't know that I've heard of Bookends. Jokes aside, the Windows AI Studio is a perfect example of the two working in perfect harmony. Without leaving the comfort of Windows 11 you can work inside Linux, use Linux apps, even code using Linux from within the Windows version of VS Code. The argument for Windows being a superior development environment now, though, has legs, in part thanks to its integration with Linux. There are still things it can do easier than Windows, and it looks like giving access to AI tools and models for Windows developers is one of those things. If Linux wasn't important, then WSL probably wouldn't exist, either. It's a useful thing to learn about, even if you're not a developer, and I think WSL is the perfect way to do this if you've only ever really used Windows. ![]() Some might not want to admit it, but Linux is important. Linux is important even for Windows developers You'll also need an NVIDIA GPU right now to use it at all. If you need help with the Linux part, our guide on how to install WSL 2 will get you pointed in the right direction. ![]() Assuming you have WSL set up and Ubuntu is set as your default, the Windows AI Studio will just work without any additional setup on your part.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |